FANDOM

BoyInCharge55

aka I Speak English/Español/Português

Bureaucrat Admin
  • I live in The communities where I have my good times
  • I was born on October 14
  • My occupation is Helping the wikis go well
  • I am Male

I am the purveyor of many international dubs of Big Idea's shows: you can contact me right here for this and other cool stuff!

Oh yeah, remember to abide by this wiki's rules or your message will be deleted the MOMENT I see it.

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hey there, BoyInCharge55.

    User:JKDoodles keeps setting the number of columns in galleries to 4 instead of 3 like they're supposed to be, and he's been doing this for a while now. I contacted you on your message wall a couple of months ago asking about what number the columns in galleries are supposed to be set to, and you told me that they're supposed to be set to 3, not 4.

    However, despite this, JKDoodles keeps setting the columns in galleries to 4, despite me, User:Goosen12, and a couple of other users trying to set them back to 3, which is what they're supposed to be set to, because having the columns in galleries set to 4 messes up the images, which doesn't happen when they're set to 3.

    What do you think? Should JKDoodles should be given a warning for constantly setting the number of columns in galleries to 4, which messes up the display of gallery images?

    -Arthur Read fan

      Loading editor
    • Arthur Read fan wrote:
      Hey there, BoyInCharge55.

      User:JKDoodles keeps setting the number of columns in galleries to 4 instead of 3 like they're supposed to be, and he's been doing this for a while now. I contacted you on your message wall a couple of months ago asking about what number the columns in galleries are supposed to be set to, and you told me that they're supposed to be set to 3, not 4.

      However, despite this, JKDoodles keeps setting the columns in galleries to 4, despite me, User:Goosen12, and a couple of other users trying to set them back to 3, which is what they're supposed to be set to, because having the columns in galleries set to 4 messes up the images, which doesn't happen when they're set to 3.

      What do you think? Should JKDoodles should be given a warning for constantly setting the number of columns in galleries to 4, which messes up the display of gallery images?

      -Arthur Read fan

      You can warn him if you'd like.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Why is larry in the villain category?

      Loading editor
    • WeareFanboyandChumChum wrote: Why is larry in the villain category?

      He was a villain in Lyle the Kindly Viking.

        Loading editor
    • 3 things. 

      1: He was? What?

      2: if he was a villain in one thing does not mean he has to be in the villain category?

      3: what did larry do to be evil?

        Loading editor
    • WeareFanboyandChumChum wrote: 3 things. 

      1: He was? What?

      2: if he was a villain in one thing does not mean he has to be in the villain category?

      3: what did larry do to be evil?

      If he was a villain in one thing, it means he should be in the Villain category. And in Lyle the Kindly Viking, Larry and the rest of the Vikings refused to share with Lyle and wanted to attack him.

        Loading editor
    • Ohhhhh. Sorry, i am kinda dumb, i watched it before and i must of forgot.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hear me out. A new user by the name of User:Chase200 commented on The Blues With Larry, and said comment appears similar to User:Veggifan's past comments if you look at their user contributions lists. (Based on the Special:BlockList, you banned Veggifan from this wiki a long time ago.)

    I don't want to get into trouble / get a warning again if it isn't the same user, so that's why I'm asking you what your thoughts are.

    -Arthur Read fan

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, did you captured VeggieTales episodes in Albanian? Mr Lunch told me that

      Loading editor
  • Who is having a boring summer due to the virus? I sure am. But what do u think? Is it the same with you? What something u miss doing cause of Corona? What's your opinion on the matter? For me, it sucks. That's all i wanted to ask, c ya.

    -Hello6767

    PS: Thanks for removing Arthur Read fan's warning. Hopefully, with it out of the way, all three of us can carry on making this wiki a great place for us and other users!

      Loading editor
    • View all 10 replies
    • 👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

      Hopefully, any further contributions from people like us can make this wiki a great place. Thanks, dude.

        Loading editor
    • Hello6767 wrote:
      👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼

      Hopefully, any further contributions from people like us can make this wiki a great place. Thanks, dude.

      You're welcome!

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I know things haven't gone so well between the two of us recently, but I would like to make peace and go back to the way things were before you gave me an unfair warning on my user page.

    Basically, I'm saying that we should just forgive and make up for what's happened, and then move forward from there.

    Maybe our understanding of what's considered "spam" (like for pages, comments, etc.) is different between the two of us, and we should come to a single consensus on what's considered spam and what isn't. I'm for that, not just for the two of us, but for the other admins and users as well.

    When I reported Hello6767's comments to you back in March, I was relatively new on this wiki, and I wasn't even a rollback yet at that point, much less an admin. I feel like in my opinion you could've told me that Hello6767's comments weren't spam, and I would've perfectly accepted that and moved on. The fact that you gave me a warning for doing something wrong that I never did, at least, according to the Big Idea Wiki:Rules, makes me feel kind of sad. Even Hello6767 doesn't think I did anything wrong. Aren't users allowed to contact admins if they see something that may be against the rules? And, if it isn't against the rules to post opinions in comments, then why doesn't the policy say so? I'm seriously asking that about the latter.

    Anyways, I'm asking for peace and forgiveness between the two of us, and we can go on peacefully from there. Also, if it isn't too much to ask for, could I please have my warning removed from my user page?

    I hope that you have a great day, and I also hope that you respond back very soon!

    -Arthur Read fan

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • Thank you for removing the warning from my user page, BoyInCharge55. I forgive you, too.

      And thanks for standing up for me, Hello6767.

      Now that everything has been resolved and peace has finally been established between us, let's move forward with improving the wiki to the best of our abilities.

      -Arthur Read fan

        Loading editor
    • @Arthur Read fan

      You're very much welcome, dude.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I noticed some of my comments from before i was blocked were reuploaded to their pages. When i asked Arthur Read fan a question about irritating characters, I asked who was it who reposted them. He told me u did, so, i just wanted to say thanks. If i need a question, I'll always go to u or Arthur Read fan. C ya around.

    -Hello6767

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey, BoyInCharge55

    Just a quick question. What's something that personally annoys u about this wiki? Could be anything, a certain user, a pic, an edit, a comment, etc. But, what is in your opinion?

    -Hello6767

      Loading editor
    • View all 12 replies
    • Hello6767 wrote: That's, honestly, my only problem with this wiki. Can there something done to complete every blank/incomplete transcript?

      Yep. Work is what helps.

        Loading editor
    • BoyInCharge55 wrote:

      Hello6767 wrote: That's, honestly, my only problem with this wiki. Can there something done to complete every blank/incomplete transcript?

      Yep. Work is what helps.

      Correct

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there, BoyInCharge55. It's Arthur Read fan.

    I noticed that you gave me a warning on my user page recently, but I don't remember having ever violated the rules and policy here. I checked my user contributions, and nothing I've done seems to have been against the Big Idea Wiki:Rules. If I made any mistake in the recent past, please tell me what I did wrong. If I did anything wrong, then I'm really, really sorry from the bottom of my heart, and I will do my best to make sure that it never, ever happens again.

    -Arthur Read fan

      Loading editor
    • Arthur Read fan wrote: Hey there, BoyInCharge55. It's Arthur Read fan.

      I noticed that you gave me a warning on my user page recently, but I don't remember having ever violated the rules and policy here. I checked my user contributions, and nothing I've done seems to have been against the Big Idea Wiki:Rules. If I made any mistake in the recent past, please tell me what I did wrong. If I did anything wrong, then I'm really, really sorry from the bottom of my heart, and I will do my best to make sure that it never, ever happens again.

      -Arthur Read fan

      Well, it turns out that Hello6767 was NOT spamming in the comments, even though you told me he was.

        Loading editor
    • Hello6767's comments seemed like spam and gibberish to me at the time, which is why I reported him. For example, in one of his comments, he said "Grapes are jerks." Some of his other comments had off-topic and irrelevant things in them as well. If they really weren't spam, you could've just told me that his comments weren't spam, and just not have blocked him. I was only expressing my concern.

      Not saying any of this to start an argument or fight, or anything of the sort. I'm not that type of person.

      Besides, I was only following what the Big Idea Wiki:Rules said at that point (and still say at the time of this writing) about the message wall and article comment policy. According to the policy, it says that people are only supposed to use the article comments for discussing the article itself, such as about facts that could be added in (i.e. production, behind-the-scenes facts) or about changing the wording of an article to better match and suit the wiki. But I have repeatedly seen users use the article comments to discuss their feelings or opinions on a character, episode, show, etc., even though Big Idea Wiki's rules state otherwise.

      Take for example, some of Hello6767's comments, or even some of User:Josh247tyson's comments, and he's an admin.

      I want you to hear me out on this. Why are people leaving opinions in article comments when the rules and policy state otherwise?

      Again, if Hello6767's comments weren't spam, then you could've just told me that they weren't, and just not have blocked him. At that point, both of us were in the wrong, because I mistook someone else's comments as spam, and you didn't really look into what Hello6767's comments were before deciding to block him. Keep in mind, I was still on the relatively new side here when that happened, and I was only going by what the policy stated. If the rules and policies here are out-of-date, then maybe they should be updated.

      -Arthur Read fan

        Loading editor
    • @Arthur Read fan

      I only made that "Grapes were jerks" comment to poke fun at the way the Grapes of Wrath treated Junior for the majority of the first segment. I now see y u ratted me for literally nothing, u were just trying to be good at being a good member of this FANDOM by taking matters in ur hands. Even if it meant disposing me for nothing.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I'm sorry for plagiarizing on Barney Wiki. Can you forgive me? I didn't know what to do at the time. You could have just blocked me for a day instead of a month. Besides I was new to this wiki at the time.

      Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.